Why Blog Posts and Responses Are ESSENTIAL (not accidental) in Active Learning

By on March 27th, 2018 in Blog Posts, Uncategorized


WHY BLOG?   If there is no learning theory and research supporting blogging than it can become as meaningless as any other classroom exercise for the sake of an exercise.

In this case, we have thought through the blog and comments on the blog as part of the structure of this course, including the learning structure of a course that only meets two hours a week. In general, at other universities, graduate courses meet three or four or five hours a week–two is very unusual; the brevity, structurally, almost necessitates lecturing and one-way transmission models for sheer efficiency of knowledge transmission.  Since lecturing is a very inefficient method for actual learning (if measured by retention or applicability of learned insights to other situations),  we are using active learning.  But active learning has its own inefficiencies and the blog allows us to fill in for those.

 Active learning/radical pedagogy/engaged learning are different terms for a similar and now quite old concept that is still not prevalent in formal higher education (Dewey, Vygostsky, bell hooks, Paulo Freire, Audre Lorde all use different terms for the same phenomenon).  Active learning is basically about students not learning from an expert but becoming expert, largely by designing and executing a knowledge exercise that they then teach to others.  (In medical school, the time-honored post-coursework method is “See one. Do one. Teach one,” an application of active learning to surgery and clinical practice.)

In active learning, the student does research as part of the structure of learning for the collective group of students, transmitting what they have learned to their classmates.  Research includes defining a topic, exploring a subject, learning deeply about that subject, and then communicating that to others in a way that allows them to experience some of the “exploratory” power of learning that topic.  The end of “See one. Do one. Teach one.” is for the person taught to then . . .”see one, do one, teach one.”

Inventory methods allow every member of the class, at least once in every class, to have a situation structured for their participation (i.e. “research” or “interpretation”–not just “seeing” but “doing”).  In inventory methods, 100% of the students are given the structural opportunity to participate at least once in each class.

Is this an efficient method?  It depends on what one means by “efficient.”  Lecturing is the most effective way for one-way communication, from professor to student.  Selectivity (calling on students who raise their hands or calling randomly) is the second. For truly interactive learning, where you yourself are grappling with your own ideas, the inventory methods are where real learning and understanding happen, in balance with knowledge (either from our readings or from our Prof Eversley or other contributions to the course by students who have made themselves expert on that week’s topic).

The blogs are a necessary not accidental.  They are a key component of active learning.  They help you develop a voice, a point of view, and an interpretation.  When others respond to your work, you have the best possible insight into how well you are conveying your ideas.

 This corrects the normal class structure: normally, the first time you express your own ideas for an audience is in your final, graded paper where the only audience is the prof.  This reinforces, in the most high-stakes way, that the only important person in the room is the prof and the “job” of higher education is to be graded well by that person.  Typically, with final projects, no one but the professor ever sees what you have done.

Blogging changes the audience of your writing and changes the ideology. And the hierarchy.

Ideally, you are writing blogs that might well be a draft for your final paper or project.  Or, also ideally, they provide a place for you to work out more systematically your own framework for interpreting a text or a phenomenon than you would ever have the chance to do in any kind of a group situation (i.e. class) and with interlocutors who both share your knowledge base but who may or may not share your interpretation of that knowledge base (the novel, the article, etc).



← Previous post

Next post →

1 Comment

  1. Professor,

    Thank you for this contextualization of the blogging process. I have found that by reading the blog posts, I am more deliberately interacting with the material and with the perspectives of the other students in the class. I do not always agree with what other students have posted, and it helps me understand other perspectives that are not only my own and/or the professor’s. I also think, when writing a blog post, it helps us as students to clarify our thoughts about the reading and to ensure that we are understanding and analyzing the material.

    With that in mind, why do you think that there has been a limited degree of interactions with the blog posts among some students? I can’t help but notice many of the posts do not have comments from the 12+ students in our course.

    As an instructor myself, it is common for students not to do their assignments and/or to hand in late work and I always struggle with how to motivate students to do the work and to rise to their potential, without being the kind of hierarchal teacher that makes unreasonable demands of students in the classroom.

    – C

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *